Updated readme

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Waterloo 2014
+In 2014, while I was in grade 12, I competed in Waterloo's senior programing cometition.
+
+These promgrams correspond to the problems found inside [Waterloo-2014.psd](./Waterloo-2014.psd).
+
+## Table of Contents
+[[_TOC_]]
+
+## Rules:
+ - 3 hours to complete as many problems as possible; only completed programs count
+ - Only writen resorces are allowed to be brought in and used (No internet/search engine)
+ - Every file must use file input and standard output (Names correspond (S1.java < S1.txt))
+ - Some programs are rated on efficency
+
+## Results
+ - 1st place in local area, doubling 2nd place's score
+ - S1 recieved full points (40) & completed every test
+ - S2 recieved full points (40) & completed every test
+ - S3 failed (15 points) because I was rushing to get S4 done
+ - S4 didn't have time to complete
+ - In hindsight, knowing I only needed to pass 3 problems to advance to nationals, I should have focused on the 3 easiest problems & ensured they all worked.

Read Me.txt

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-Here are my competition programs, I completed 3/5 (+an unworking program that I didnt have time for (#4))
-All my programs are unmodified sense I originaly codded them so you can see my raw coding skill well working fast and underpressure. The only
-things I added was the comment to walk you through my thought prosses
-
-Summary of rules:
- - Only writen resorces are allowed to be brought in and used
- - Every file must use file input and standard output (Names correspond (S1.java < S1.txt))
- - 3 hours to complete as many as possible + only completed programs count
- - some programs may be rated on efficency
-
-Notes:
- - I doubled the second place person's score in the local area.
-
-UPDATE:
- - My first two programs recieved full marks and completed every test
- - My third failed misserably and because I needed a minimum of 40 points (15 points a question)
-   I could not move on to participate at waterloo

S1.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 10
 2
 2
-3
+3