Check for duplicates before adding tickets #12

Merged
ztimson merged 6 commits from ticket-duplicates into master 2025-12-31 00:02:18 -05:00
3 changed files with 15 additions and 7 deletions
Showing only changes of commit 9e5372f37b - Show all commits

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@ztimson/ai-agents",
"version": "0.0.8",
"version": "0.1.0",
"description": "AI agents",
"keywords": ["ai", "review"],
"author": "ztimson",

View File

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ dotenv.config({path: '.env.local', override: true, quiet: true});
if(resp.ok) return resp.json();
else throw new Error(`${resp.status} ${await resp.text()}`);
});
if(issueData.labels.length !== 1 || issueData.labels?.[0] !== 'Review/AI') {
if(issueData.labels?.[0]?.name !== 1 || issueData.labels?.[0] !== 'Review/AI') {
console.log('Skipping');
return process.exit();
}
@@ -150,11 +150,13 @@ Output ONLY markdown. No explanations, labels, or extra formatting.`});
if(!body) throw new Error('Invalid response from AI');
ztimson marked this conversation as resolved
Review

Error handling change: Changed from graceful exit with exit code 1 to throwing an error. This is a behavioral change that could affect how the script is used in CI/CD pipelines. Ensure this is intentional and that calling code can handle the exception.

Error handling change: Changed from graceful exit with exit code 1 to throwing an error. This is a behavioral change that could affect how the script is used in CI/CD pipelines. Ensure this is intentional and that calling code can handle the exception.
// Check for duplicates
const repoInfo = await fetch(`${git}/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}`, {headers: {'Authorization': `token ${auth}`},}).then(resp => resp.ok ? resp.json() : null);
ztimson marked this conversation as resolved
Review

Critical bug: The search API endpoint is missing the repository path segment. This should be ${git}/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}/issues/search instead of ${git}/api/v1/repos/issues/search. Without the proper path, the API call will likely fail or search globally instead of within the specific repository.

Critical bug: The search API endpoint is missing the repository path segment. This should be `${git}/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}/issues/search` instead of `${git}/api/v1/repos/issues/search`. Without the proper path, the API call will likely fail or search globally instead of within the specific repository.
const search = await fetch(`${git}/api/v1/repos/issues/search`, {
method: 'POST',
headers: {'Authorization': `token ${auth}`, 'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
body: JSON.stringify({
priority_repo_id: repo,
owner,
ztimson marked this conversation as resolved
Review

Bug: The priority_repo_id parameter expects a numeric repository ID, but repoInfo.id could be null if the fetch on line 152 failed (returns null when !resp.ok). This will cause the search to fail. Add proper error handling: if(!repoInfo) throw new Error('Failed to fetch repository info'); before using repoInfo.id.

Bug: The `priority_repo_id` parameter expects a numeric repository ID, but `repoInfo.id` could be null if the fetch on line 152 failed (returns null when !resp.ok). This will cause the search to fail. Add proper error handling: `if(!repoInfo) throw new Error('Failed to fetch repository info');` before using repoInfo.id.
priority_repo_id: repoInfo.id,
type: 'issues',
limit: 3,
q: title
ztimson marked this conversation as resolved
Review

Error handling issue: If the search API returns an error, the code defaults to an empty array []. This silently fails and skips duplicate detection. Consider logging a warning or handling the error more explicitly to avoid missing duplicates due to API failures.

Error handling issue: If the search API returns an error, the code defaults to an empty array `[]`. This silently fails and skips duplicate detection. Consider logging a warning or handling the error more explicitly to avoid missing duplicates due to API failures.
Review

Type safety issue: The fallback [] when resp.ok is false means search could be an empty array or the actual response data. This inconsistency could cause issues if the API response structure is unexpected. Consider explicitly handling the error case.

Type safety issue: The fallback `[]` when `resp.ok` is false means `search` could be an empty array or the actual response data. This inconsistency could cause issues if the API response structure is unexpected. Consider explicitly handling the error case.
Review

Race condition: The duplicate search uses the title variable which is set by the AI tool call. If the AI hasn't called the title tool yet at this point in execution, title will be an empty string, causing the search query to be empty or invalid. Consider moving the duplicate check after ensuring the AI has completed and set the title, or add validation: if(!title) throw new Error('AI failed to set title');

Race condition: The duplicate search uses the `title` variable which is set by the AI tool call. If the AI hasn't called the `title` tool yet at this point in execution, `title` will be an empty string, causing the search query to be empty or invalid. Consider moving the duplicate check after ensuring the AI has completed and set the title, or add validation: `if(!title) throw new Error('AI failed to set title');`
@@ -167,7 +169,7 @@ Output ONLY markdown. No explanations, labels, or extra formatting.`});
system: `Your job is to identify duplicates. Respond with the ID number of the duplicate or nothing if there are no matches \n\n${dupes}`
}))?.pop()?.content;
ztimson marked this conversation as resolved
Review

Logic issue: The duplicate detection uses hasDuplicates.includes(id.toString()) which is a substring match. This could cause false positives (e.g., ID 123 would match content containing "1234"). Consider using a more precise matching strategy or parsing the AI response more carefully.

Logic issue: The duplicate detection uses `hasDuplicates.includes(id.toString())` which is a substring match. This could cause false positives (e.g., ID 123 would match content containing "1234"). Consider using a more precise matching strategy or parsing the AI response more carefully.
Review

Logic issue: The regex pattern (^| )${id}( |$) performs substring matching which could cause false positives. For example, if the AI response contains "123" it would match issue ID 12 or 23. Consider using word boundaries or more precise parsing of the AI response to extract the exact ID number.

Logic issue: The regex pattern `(^| )${id}( |$)` performs substring matching which could cause false positives. For example, if the AI response contains "123" it would match issue ID 12 or 23. Consider using word boundaries or more precise parsing of the AI response to extract the exact ID number.
// Handle duplicates
if(!!hasDuplicates && (dupeId = dupeIds.find(id => hasDuplicates.includes(id.toString()))) != null) {
if(!!hasDuplicates && (dupeId = dupeIds.find(id => new RegExp(`(^| )${id}( |$)`, 'm').test(hasDuplicates)))) {
await fetch(`${git}/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}/issues/${ticket}/comments`, {
method: 'POST',
ztimson marked this conversation as resolved
Review

Bug: JSON string is manually constructed instead of using JSON.stringify(). The body should be body: JSON.stringify({body: \Duplicate of #${dupeId}`})` to properly escape special characters and prevent JSON injection vulnerabilities.

Bug: JSON string is manually constructed instead of using `JSON.stringify()`. The body should be `body: JSON.stringify({body: \`Duplicate of #${dupeId}\`})` to properly escape special characters and prevent JSON injection vulnerabilities.
Review

JSON injection vulnerability: The JSON body is manually constructed using a template literal instead of JSON.stringify(). If dupeId contains special characters like quotes or backslashes, this will produce invalid JSON or allow injection. Change to: body: JSON.stringify({body: \Duplicate of #${dupeId}`})`

JSON injection vulnerability: The JSON body is manually constructed using a template literal instead of JSON.stringify(). If `dupeId` contains special characters like quotes or backslashes, this will produce invalid JSON or allow injection. Change to: `body: JSON.stringify({body: \`Duplicate of #${dupeId}\`})`
headers: {'Authorization': `token ${auth}`, 'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
@@ -188,7 +190,7 @@ Output ONLY markdown. No explanations, labels, or extra formatting.`});
}
// Update ticket
const updateRes = await fetch(`${git}/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}/issues/${ticket}`, {
await fetch(`${git}/api/v1/repos/${owner}/${repo}/issues/${ticket}`, {
method: 'PATCH',
headers: {'Authorization': `token ${auth}`, 'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
body: JSON.stringify({title, body})
@@ -202,4 +204,7 @@ Output ONLY markdown. No explanations, labels, or extra formatting.`});
}
console.log(`Title: ${title}\nType: ${type}\nBody:\n${body}`);
})();
})().catch(err => {
console.error(`Error: ${err.message || err.toString()}`);
process.exit(1);
});

View File

@@ -106,4 +106,7 @@ dotenv.config({path: '.env.local', override: true, quiet: true, debug: false});
if(!res.ok) throw new Error(`${res.status} ${await res.text()}`);
}
console.log(comments.map(c => `${c.path}${c.new_position ? `:${c.new_position}` : ''}\n${c.body}`).join('\n\n') + '\n\n' + summary);
})();
})().catch(err => {
console.error(`Error: ${err.message || err.toString()}`);
process.exit(1);
});